Thursday, March 17, 2011

Democratic Green Bay

In an oddity of screen scraping and the recent Press Gannett website redesign, I ended up re-reading an article about former Aldperperson and current Supervisor Vander Leest's lawsuit that was thrown out last year. It brought to mind a comment John once emphatically made to me, "Green Bay is a CONSERVATIVE TOWN!" Well, let's check the truth of that statement for Green Bay's district 11 in this last election where Republicans won big:

Walker won:
42 364 426
43 358 457
44 347 417
45 354 340

Johnson won:
42 342 457
43 355 470
44 348 421
45 350 353

Ribble won:
42 379 421
43 377 450
44 361 412
45 360 344

After looking at two others, we come upon our first district that went Republican. Perhaps this helps explain Vander Leest's perspective. Interesting that the ward that borders Howard actually went Democratic in two races. What about previous years? Looking back to 2008:

Kagen won:
42 575 482
43 599 509
44 591 486
45 691 431

And Hansen won huge:
42 703 337
43 711 382
44 708 348
45 760 326

So, in the most blue of blue years, the district went to the Democrats and by a larger margin than the Republicans had in 2010. Perhaps some Democrats only come out for the presidentials, maybe it's a swing district, or something else is going on. What if we go back one more election to 2006, how did folks vote in district 11?

Doyle barely won:
42 429 469
43 445 485
44 397 438
45 514 369

Kohl won big:
42 608 291
43 648 269
44 584 234
45 640 227

Kagen won too:
42 430 470
43 463 484
44 422 418
45 497 390

Is Green Bay a "conservative town" as Aldervisor Vander Leest suggested? This series of posts entitled "Democratic Green Bay" should make obvious my views. So, I'll just point out that we live in the City of Green Bay. The Town of Green Bay is along the bay to the north-east on the other side of the Town of Scott.

As far as the views of the voters of district 11? Comparing 2006 to 2010 because they are both non-presidential years, it looks to me that the Replublican vote was about the same and Democratic voters turned out in 2006 but not in 2010. The 2008 Democratic blowout is consistent with this. In my view, even though the conservative Vander Leest family dynasty has won more elections than not, their views, values and attitudes are likely not consistent with the majority of the voters they represent.

No comments: