This is really interesting! I wonder what the data makeup is and how accurate?
This is interesting analysis. Basically a word heat map of the tickers of MSNBC, Fox, and CNN with axes for the frequency.
I expected Fox to be different, but CNN and MSNBC? That's quite a spread.
I wonder if anyone is researching gathering information for all channels for all communication-- written, spoken, non-verbal-- to come up with automatic fact checking or political spectrum identification or emotional leaning or ? Taking this to the absurd, can you tell if the editor or camera operator are having a bad day based on the product?
It isn't hard to imagine building intermediate software then edit requested info from multiple sources in to derivative product as requested by the consumer. The days of, "Hey Siri, I want to listen to the political news for today, make sure it thoughtfully shares multiple perspectives and that there are some optimistic stories included." don't seem that far off.
Could this would help make people aware when they are living in a single perspective echo chamber?
...but so is support for undermining our democracy:
Fifteen Wisconsin legislators signed a Jan. 5 letter calling on Vice President Mike Pence to refuse to certify the 2020 presidential election results. The letter amplified the lies and conspiracy theories that were advanced by Trump and the rioters he incited as they sought to block the certification of Electoral College votes from states such as Wisconsin that had backed Joe Biden for president.
The Wisconsin legislators who signed the letter were state Reps. Janel Brandtjen, R-Menomonee Falls; Rob Brooks, R-Saukville; Rick Gundrum, R-Slinger, Cody Horlacher, R-Mukwonago; Dan Knodl, R-Germantown; Gae Magnafici, R-Dresser; Dave Murphy, R-Greenville; Jeff Mursau, R-Crivitz; Timothy Ramthun, R-Campbellsport; Joe Sanfelippo, R-New Berlin; Michael Schraa, R-Oshkosh; Shae Sortwell, R-Two Rivers; Jeremy Thiesfeldt, R-Fond du Lac; Chuck Wichgers, R-Muskego. State Sen. André Jacque, R-De Pere, also signed on to the letter, according to the Wisconsin Examiner.
Personally, I don't doubt these folks believe there were irregularities but where we seem to disagree in that the they were big enough to make any difference in the outcome. When someone wants to believe something so badly, it becomes a distortion field. Everyone has experienced this.
Contrast this behavior with the prior election where foreign interference with the information flowing to and through the body politic seems to be unquestioned by those in the know. Once the votes were counted, were there dozens of lawsuits and political maneuverings? (By the way, can we please think about some proportional responses to anything provable the Russian government and/or oligarchs may have done in the past four years now?)
It's going to be interesting to see how this all plays out. This president values cooperation among elected but also party building and, therefore, partisan organizing. He's going to reach out where he can to cooperate. Will the old guard Republicans engage or will it be more decisiveness? There are more liberals in our country than republicans, they just don't vote every election. Beware waking up the presidential cycle majority to the fact that there are other elections with consequences.
Listening to Mike Glover on Andy Stumpf's Cleared Hot podcast this morning, I was concerned to hear an organization Mike works with (founded?) has been deplatformed. He didn't mention which platform but he said there was no warning and the account was just gone.
I wanted to see if I could surmise why. The latest blog entry is a bit old but defines a list of "thread forces" being "monitored". It starts with an international lists of competitor countries and enemy groups. Maybe not the same list but others would put up but passes the smell test for me, fair enough.
But then it goes on to list the "national threat forces". I googled a few and some I recognized and I gotta tell you, I don't see ANYTHING from the right wing extreme on the list. It's all left wing stuff from what I saw including at least one legal, actual political party. No nationalist, fascist, or supremacist/separationist threats at all? Really?
I have heard Mr. Glover on podcasts a few times now and he claims that this organization is non-political. Some of the national threats may be actual threats, I don't know. Now you and I may not agree with the political views espoused by the communist party but many people served and died defending this country so that everyone, including communists, can share and advocate for their ideas. The website doesn't list why the communist party is a national threat. Nevermind there is an e-day countdown clock on the bottom of the page. Not so non-political, really.
So I stopped looking. I don't know how deplatforming works or why it happens. Based on a cursory look at the website, I can see it could have been caught up in filters looking for violent or misinformation spreading nationalist agitators. I don't agree with it, but I understand it and acting surprised feels disingenuous to me based on what I read.